Conan the Barbarian was directed by Marcus Nispel, who is mainly known for a couple of reimaginings of classic horror films and the very poorly received Pathfinder. And was written by an assortments of writers, all of which have pretty terrible scripts to their names.
It stars Jason Momoa as the titular character, as well as Rose McGowan, Ron Perlman and Stephen Lang.
The original Conan The Barbarian was by no means a great film, and certainly wasn't a particularly successful one as it failed in it's aim to launch the heroic fantasy genre into mainstream cinema and only succeeded in propelling Arnold Shwarzenegger into a career full of terrible action films.
But at least that film had aims to speak of, and fulfilled a purpose of sorts (whether it was a good purpose is a matter of opinion of course), but this remake is nothing more than an enormous waste of money in the worst possible kind of way.
This film was terribly made and contains not a single noteworthy performance or well written line of dialogue, and yet all this isn't where it fails so horribly. For I have seen films made in a considerably worse fashion that were infinitely better than this one.
What lets this film down so much, is it's very nature. The fact that it is a remake of a film that so summed up a certain portion of Hollywood Cinema in the 80's does not work in this film favour, for while it is a "re-imagining" of the story, it has not re-imagined the themes and values presented within the film to fit a modern audience, thus while the originals' faults in this department can be laid down to being in some respect representative of the times it was made in, this film has no excuse.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9a75/a9a754e9c86aac60f3e294fc23fcf8ecb8adf2c4" alt=""
We have all the scantily clad yet ultimately useless females, the hulking, moronic hero, the comedic black sidekick, the Arabic thief etc... All who fill out their stereotypical roles perfectly, with bad accents where required.
However, I have noticed that this isn't one of the primary complaints brought up by those criticising this film. Perhaps the slew of 80's inspired films that has appeared recently has altered viewers perception of this aspect.
But to be honest, there is so much wrong with this film that I'm not surprised many people overlooked the previous point.
What surprised me about this film was that although I had expected to see an uninspired story, cartoonish characters, bad dialogue etc... I was shocked to find that even the elements one pays less attention too were poor. Such as the sound editing, how often do you see a review mention this? But here I feel I must because it was quite poor indeed, with overly loud battle sequences, but barely audible dialogue and just a bad sound design all around.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/143f8/143f83d77006cb0e123772dd0d5d3d2e1d938eaf" alt=""
Speaking of fights, the battle sequences in this film are massively disappointing, if a film about a barbarian's quest for bloody revenge set in a land torn apart by far can't even create good or even particularly memorable action sequences, then has it any use at all?
Thus we come to the core point of my dissatisfaction with this film: Conan The Barbarian is an utterly useless film, it sets out with no goals, and consequently achieves nothing. It can be seen as a quick shot of fast food cinematic entertainement, and surely will be seen that way by the majority of people, but the fact that 70 million was spent on a film with no creativity put into it, not even the slightest vision propelling it, makes me lament the existence of this film rather than shrug it off as mindless entertainment.
All in all, Conan The Barbarian is an almost unbelievably bad film, that could still have been mildly amusing had it not taken itself so seriously.
This may seem like a rather short review, but I really have nothing more to say about this enormous waste of time and money.
0 Yorumlar